Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21.220
Filter
1.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38563166

ABSTRACT

Objective:To analyze the mutation spectrum of 23-site chip newborn deafness genetic screening in Beijing, and to provide basis for genetic counseling and clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods:The study included 21 006 babies born in Beijing from December 2022 to June 2023. All subjects underwent newborn deafness genetic screening in Beijing Tongren Hospital, covering 23 variants in 4 genes, the GJB2 gene(c.35delG, c.176_191del16, c.235delC, c.299_300delAT, c.109G>A, c.257C>G, c.512insAACG, c.427C>T, c.35insG), SLC26A4 gene(c.919-2A>G, c.2168A>G, c.1174A>T, c.1226G>A, c.1229C>T, c.1975G>C, c.2027T>A, c.589G>A, c.1707+5G>A, c.917insG, c.281C>T), Mt12SrRNA(m.1555A>G, m.1494C>T) and GJB3 gene(c.538C>T). The mutation detection rate and allele frequency were analyzed. Results:The overall mutation detection rate was 11.516%(2 419/21 006), with the GJB2 gene being the most frequently involved at 9.097%(1 911/21 006), followed by the SLC26A4 gene at 2.123%(446/21 006), the GJB3 gene at 0.362%(76/21 006) and Mt12SrRNA at 0.176%(37/21 006). Among the GJB2 genes, c.109G>A and c.235delC mutation detection rates were the highest, with 6.579%(1 382/21 006) and 1.795%(377/21 006), respectively. Of the SLC26A4 genes, c.919-2A>G and c.2168A>G had the highest mutation rates of 1.423%(299/21 006) and 0.233%(49/21 106), respectively. Regarding the allele frequency, GJB2 c.109G>A was the most common variant with an allele frequency of 3.359%(1 411/42 012), followed by the GJB2 c.235delC at 0.897%(377/42 012) and the SLC26A4 c.919-2A>G at 0.719%(302/42 012). Conclusion:23-site chip newborn deafness genetic screening in Beijing showed that GJB2 c.109G>A mutation detection rate and allele frequency were the highest. This study has enriched the epidemiological data of 23-site chip genetic screening mutation profiles for neonatal deafness, which can provide evidence for clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Loss , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Connexins/genetics , Connexin 26/genetics , Deafness/genetics , Deafness/diagnosis , DNA Mutational Analysis , Sulfate Transporters/genetics , Genetic Testing , Mutation , Hearing Loss/genetics , Neonatal Screening , China
2.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 50(4): 48-56, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569105

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The current quasi-experimental study aimed to develop and evaluate a virtual staff training on age-related hearing loss at a care organization for older adults. METHOD: Training included the use of affordable headset amplifiers and a hands-on activity in which hearing loss was simulated. Staff were encouraged to offer amplifiers to assist in communication given the high prevalence of untreated hearing loss among older adults and the increased communication difficulty that results from mask-wearing. RESULTS: Quantitative results (N = 51) from the pre/post questionnaire suggest that staff members gained knowledge about hearing loss and communication through the training session. Qualitative data over the 6-month post training suggest that some older adults had not only improved speech understanding but also improved quality of interactions with staff. The main reasons for not using the amplifiers were that staff would forget they had access to the amplifiers or the older adult would refuse to use the device. CONCLUSION: This article highlights successes of the training as well as ideas for future trainings suggested by staff members. A key finding was the need to identify a core group of staff members who would be charged with facilitating use of personal amplification for older adults in the organization. In addition, providing multiple brief trainings over time was suggested to improve adoption of good communication practices among staff. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 50(4), 48-56.].


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Humans , Aged , Communication
3.
Noise Health ; 26(120): 44-50, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570310

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to verify the association between the auditory handicap found in the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening Version (HHIE-S) questionnaire and hearing loss and the plasma levels of inflammatory biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 76 participants, 67 (88%) females and 9 (12%) males, with a mean age of 70 years. Tonal threshold audiometry and self-assessment with HHIE-S questionnaire were performed to measure the plasma levels of interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10; tumor necrosis factor alpha; and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) flow cytometry method. For all data analyzed, the significance level adopted was P < 0.05 and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: An inverse correlation was observed between the increase in plasma levels of IFN-γ and normal auditory handicap (P = 0.015; rs = -0.280). The severe handicap group showed an increase in the averages I (P = 0.005; rs = 0.350) and II (P = 0.016; rs = 0.368) in the right ear and the light/moderate handicap group increased the means I (P = 0.027; rs = 0.350) and II (P = 0.046; rs = 0.310) of the left ear. A statistically significant association was found between the speech recognition threshold (SRT) test results of the right ear and the severe handicap group (P = 0.002; rs = 0.271). CONCLUSIONS: There was an association between the increase in plasma levels of IFN-γ and normal auditory handicap. Additionally, statistically significant associations were observed between the mild/moderate and severe handicap groups with the increase in hearing means and an increase in SRT associated with the severe handicap group.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Interferon-gamma , Male , Female , Humans , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sensation
4.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 976, 2024 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of how the prevalence of hearing loss and its associated factors change over time could help in developing an appropriate program to prevent the development of hearing loss. METHODS: Population-representative cross-sectional data from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were used to estimate the trends in the prevalence of hearing loss among adults in the USA over the period 1999-2018. A total of 15,498 adult participants aged 20 years or older had complete audiometric examination data. Logistic regression was employed to evaluate the trend in hearing loss; weighted Rao-Scott χ2 tests and univariate logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between hearing loss and relevant factors. RESULTS: The overall hearing loss prevalence in 1999-2018 was 19.1% 19.1 (95% CI, 18.0-20.2%). The prevalence of hearing loss decreased in cycles (P for trend < 0.001). For participants aged 20-69 years, the prevalence decreased from 15.6% (95% CI, 12.9-18.4%) in 1999-2000 to 14.9% (95% CI, 13.2- 16.6%) in 2015-2016; for participants aged > 70 years the prevalence decreased from 79.9% (95% CI, 76.1-83.8%) in 2005-2006 to 64.5% (95% CI, 58.8-70.2%) in 2017-2018. Participants with hearing loss were likely to be older, male, non-Hispanic white, and to have not completed high school. Mild hearing loss was more prevalent among those aged 20-79 years; in those aged over 80 years the prevalence of moderate hearing loss exceeded that of mild loss. Among all otologically normal participants, hearing thresholds increased with age across the entire frequency range. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of hearing loss in USA adults changed over the period 1999-2018. The trends observed provide valuable insight for making public health plans and allocating resources to hearing care. Further investigation is necessary to monitor hearing loss and its potential risk factors.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Loss , Adult , Humans , Male , United States/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Nutrition Surveys , Prevalence , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(16): e37702, 2024 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640279

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Hereditary hearing loss is known to exhibit a significant degree of genetic heterogeneity. Herein, we present a case report of a novel mutation in the tenascin-C (TNC) gene in Chinese patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL). PATIENT CONCERNS: This includes a young deaf couple and their 2-year-old baby. DIAGNOSES: Based on the clinical information, hearing test, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), Sanger sequencing, protein function and structure analysis, and model prediction, in our case, the study results revealed 2 heterozygous mutations in the TNC gene (c.2852C>T, p.Thr951Ile) and the TBC1 domain family member 24 (TBC1D24) gene (c.1570C>T, p.Arg524Trp). These mutations may be responsible for the hearing loss observed in this family. Notably, the heterozygous mutations in the TNC gene (c.2852C>T, p.Thr951Ile) have not been previously reported in the literature. INTERVENTIONS: Avoid taking drugs that can cause deafness, wearing hearing AIDS, and cochlear implants. OUTCOMES: Regular follow-up of family members is ongoing. LESSONS: The genetic diagnosis of NSHL holds significant importance as it helps in making informed treatment decisions, providing prognostic information, and offering genetic counseling for the patient's family.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss , Humans , Child, Preschool , Deafness/genetics , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics , Hearing Loss/genetics , Mutation , China , Pedigree , GTPase-Activating Proteins/genetics
6.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 179: 111930, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38579404

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children may experience communication delays, irrespective of early intervention and technology. Australian Sign Language (Auslan) is one approach in early intervention to address language delays. Current prevalence of Auslan use among Australian families with DHH children is unknown. AIMS: The first aim was to determine the proportion of families enrolled in an Australian statewide hearing loss databank who use Auslan with their DHH child. The second aim was to explore the relationships between indicators of child hearing loss (bilateral or unilateral hearing loss, degree of hearing loss, and device use: hearing aids and cochlear implants), family factors (maternal education, attendance at early intervention, family history of deafness, and socio-economic disadvantage) and the family's reported use of Auslan. METHODS: We analysed the enrolment data from 997 families who participated in an Australian statewide hearing loss databank between 2012 and 2021. We described the proportion of families who used Auslan with their DHH child at home. The association between indicators of child hearing loss and family factors, and the parental reports of communication approach were examined using correlation analyses. RESULTS: Eighty-seven of 997 parents (8.7%) reported using Auslan with their DHH child. Of these, 26 (2.6%) used Auslan as their primary language. The use of Auslan at home was associated with the following indicators of child hearing loss: bilateral hearing loss, profound compared to mild hearing loss, and cochlear implant and hearing aid use compared to no device use. The family factors associated with the use of Auslan were: referral or attendance at early intervention compared to those who did not attend, and a family history of deafness compared to those with none. No association was found between maternal education and socio-economic disadvantage and the use of Auslan. CONCLUSION: This Australian study found a low proportion (8.7%) of families with a DHH child who reported using Auslan. Seven child hearing loss and family factors were considered, and five were significantly associated with using Auslan at home. Children with a greater degree of hearing loss, attendance at early intervention and family history of deafness tended to use Auslan.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Child , Humans , Deafness/epidemiology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Australia/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/epidemiology
7.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 98(4): 1443-1455, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38607756

ABSTRACT

Background: Studies demonstrate associations between low social activity in older adults and cognitive decline. Little has been investigated regarding which factors are associated with low social activity in older adults at increased risk of dementia. Objective: We investigate which sociodemographic, psychological, health-related, and environmental factors are associated with low social activity in older adults at increased risk of dementia. Additionally, we describe the stages of health behavior change, the types of social activities, and the duration of the current level of social activity. Methods: We used baseline data of 1,015 participants from the AgeWell.de trial. We conducted logistic and Poisson regression analyses to investigate factors associated with low social activity. We report descriptive statistics on the stages of change in the sample, the types of social activities most frequently pursued, and the duration of the current level of social activity. Results: Lower income, non-usage of public transport, depressive symptoms, cognitive, mobility, and hearing impairment were negatively associated with social activity. The majority of the sample was in the maintenance stage, followed by the precontemplation stage. The most common social activities were traveling and hobbies with others. Participants have maintained their current level of social activity for several years. Conclusions: We identified a lack of resources (income, transport), depressive symptoms and poorer health (cognitive, mobility and hearing impairment) as barriers to social activity. Interventions promoting social activity in older adults at risk of dementia may specifically target individuals with these risk factors. Low-threshold opportunities for social activity may be particularly beneficial.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction , Dementia , Hearing Loss , Humans , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Social Behavior , Dementia/epidemiology , Dementia/psychology , Hearing Loss/psychology
8.
Redox Rep ; 29(1): 2332038, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38563333

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Gentamicin is one of the most common ototoxic drugs that can lower patients' quality of life. Oxidative stress is a key factors inducing sensory hair cell death during gentamicin administration. So far, there are no effective drugs to prevent or treat gentamicin- induced hearing loss. A recent study found cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) as a new target to modulate cellular oxidative balance. The objective of this study was to estimate the effect of the CFTR activator ivacaftor on gentamicin-induced ototoxicity and determine its mechanism. METHODS: The hair cell count was analyzed by Myosin 7a staining. Apoptosis was analyzed by TUNEL Apoptosis Kit. Cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) level was detected by DCFH-DA probes. The Nrf2 related proteins expression levels were analyzed by western blot. RESULTS: An in vitro cochlear explant model showed that gentamicin caused ROS accumulation in sensory hair cells and induced apoptosis, and this effect was alleviated by pretreatment with ivacaftor. Western blotting showed that ivacaftor administration markedly increased the protein expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), heme oxygenase-1 (HO1), and NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1). The protective effect of ivacaftor was abolished by the Nrf2 inhibitor ML385. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate the protective role of the CFTR-Nrf2-HO1/NQO1 pathway in gentamicin-induced ototoxicity. Ivacaftor may be repositioned or repurposed towards aminoglycosides-induced hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Aminophenols , Hearing Loss , Ototoxicity , Quinolones , Humans , Gentamicins/toxicity , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , NF-E2-Related Factor 2/metabolism , Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator/metabolism , Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator/pharmacology , Heme Oxygenase-1/metabolism , Heme Oxygenase-1/pharmacology , Quality of Life , Oxidative Stress , Apoptosis , NAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone)/metabolism , NAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone)/pharmacology
9.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 7911, 2024 04 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575713

ABSTRACT

Spatial localization is important for social interaction and safe mobility, and relies heavily on vision and hearing. While people with vision or hearing impairment compensate with their intact sense, people with dual sensory impairment (DSI) may require rehabilitation strategies that take both impairments into account. There is currently no tool for assessing the joint effect of vision and hearing impairment on spatial localization in this large and increasing population. To this end, we developed a novel Dual Sensory Spatial Localization Questionnaire (DS-SLQ) that consists of 35 everyday spatial localization tasks. The DS-SLQ asks participants about their difficulty completing different tasks using only vision or hearing, as well as the primary sense they rely on for each task. We administered the DS-SLQ to 104 participants with heterogenous vision and hearing status. Rasch analysis confirmed the psychometric validity of the DS-SLQ and the feasibility of comparing vision and hearing spatial abilities in a unified framework. Vision and hearing impairment were associated with decreased visual and auditory spatial abilities. Differences between vision and hearing abilities predicted overall sensory reliance patterns. In DSI rehabilitation, DS-SLQ may be useful for measuring vision and hearing spatial localization abilities and predicting the better sense for completing different spatial localization tasks.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Spatial Navigation , Humans , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Trials ; 25(1): 256, 2024 Apr 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38610038

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Teleaudiology can potentially improve access to hearing healthcare services. Remote hearing aid fittings offer a new mode of service delivery that removes barriers of geography and access to an audiologist. Real-ear measurements (REMs) are the gold standard for hearing aid output verification but require in-clinic appointments. This study will investigate whether remote hearing aid fittings can provide clinically equivalent outcomes when compared to current, in-clinic, best practice guidelines. RESEARCH DESIGN: A repeated measure, double-blinded crossover design will be used. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups to determine order of intervention, balanced for degree of hearing loss. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty adults with mild to moderate hearing loss and at least 1 year of experience with hearing aids will be recruited. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Participants will complete two hearing aid fitting protocols, one using an in-clinic fitting process and the other using a remote (at-home) fitting process. In-clinic fittings will include REMs with adjustments to standard (NAL-NL2) prescription targets. The two fitting protocols will then be randomly assigned to participants in a crossover design, so participants and researchers will be blinded to the order of the two fitting protocols. Participants will then have a 4-week period with follow-up appointments for participant-directed gain adjustment. For each fitting protocol, participants will complete objective measurements of final hearing aid output with REMs, speech-in-noise testing, subjective measurements of hearing aid performance, and quality of life measurements. They will then begin an identical period of living with, adjusting, and objective assessment with the other fitting protocol. Data will be analysed as repeated measures with statistical control for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Data will compare the four-frequency average real-ear aided response (4FREAR) for hearing aids programmed in-clinic and hearing aids programmed remotely, after participant-directed gain adjustments. Secondary measures will assess clinically significant differences in estimated speech intelligibility, hearing-related quality of life, hearing aid benefit, sound quality and preference, and speech-in-noise ability. CONCLUSIONS: This study will inform the development of best practice guidelines for remote hearing aid fittings. If no clinically significant differences are found between in-clinic and remote fit hearing aids, it has the potential to expand teleaudiology initiatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12623000028606p . Date of registration: 12 January 2023.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss , Adult , Humans , Quality of Life , Australia , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
11.
J Transl Med ; 22(1): 345, 2024 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600566

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss has been shown to be a risk factor for psychiatric disorders. In addition, long-term hearing loss is associated with increased hospitalization and mortality rates; however, the increased risk and duration of effect of hearing loss in combination with other chronic diseases on each psychiatric disorder are still not clearly defined. The purpose of this article is to clarify the risk of hearing loss for each disorder over time. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study, and a national health insurance research database in Taiwan was utilized. All (n = 1,949,101) Taiwanese residents who had a medical visit between 2000 and 2015 were included. Patients with hearing loss and a comparative retrospective cohort were analyzed. Every subject was tracked individually from their index date to identify the subjects who later received a diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder. The Kaplan‒Meier method was used to analyze the cumulative incidence of psychiatric disorders. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the risk of psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: A total of 13,341 (15.42%) and 31,250 (9.03%) patients with and without hearing loss, respectively, were diagnosed with psychiatric disorders (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that hearing loss significantly elevated the risk of psychiatric disorders (adjusted HR = 2.587, 95% CI 1.723-3.346, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that patients with hearing loss are more likely to develop psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, the various psychiatric disorders are more likely to occur at different times. Our findings have important clinical implications, including a need for clinicians to implement early intervention for hearing loss and to pay close attention to patients' psychological status. Trial registration TSGHIRB No. E202216036.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Mental Disorders , Humans , Cohort Studies , Hearing Loss/complications , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Incidence , Mental Disorders/complications , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Taiwan/epidemiology
12.
BMC Genomics ; 25(1): 359, 2024 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605287

ABSTRACT

Inherited hearing impairment is a remarkably heterogeneous monogenic condition, involving hundreds of genes, most of them with very small (< 1%) epidemiological contributions. The exception is GJB2, the gene encoding connexin-26 and underlying DFNB1, which is the most frequent type of autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing impairment (ARNSHI) in most populations (up to 40% of ARNSHI cases). DFNB1 is caused by different types of pathogenic variants in GJB2, but also by large deletions that keep the gene intact but remove an upstream regulatory element that is essential for its expression. Such large deletions, found in most populations, behave as complete loss-of-function variants, usually associated with a profound hearing impairment. By using CRISPR-Cas9 genetic edition, we have generated a murine model (Dfnb1em274) that reproduces the most frequent of those deletions, del(GJB6-D13S1830). Dfnb1em274 homozygous mice are viable, bypassing the embryonic lethality of the Gjb2 knockout, and present a phenotype of profound hearing loss (> 90 dB SPL) that correlates with specific structural abnormalities in the cochlea. We show that Gjb2 expression is nearly abolished and its protein product, Cx26, is nearly absent all throughout the cochlea, unlike previous conditional knockouts in which Gjb2 ablation was not obtained in all cell types. The Dfnb1em274 model recapitulates the clinical presentation of patients harbouring the del(GJB6-D13S1830) variant and thus it is a valuable tool to study the pathological mechanisms of DFNB1 and to assay therapies for this most frequent type of human ARNSHI.


Subject(s)
Connexins , Hearing Loss , Humans , Animals , Mice , Disease Models, Animal , Connexin 30/genetics , Connexin 26/genetics , Connexins/genetics , Hearing Loss/genetics , Phenotype , Mutation
13.
BMC Med Genomics ; 17(1): 89, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Branchio-oto-renal syndrome (BOR, OMIM#113,650) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder that presents with a variety of symptoms, including hearing loss (sensorineural, conductive, or mixed), structural abnormalities affecting the outer, middle, and inner ear, branchial fistulas or cysts, as well as renal abnormalities.This study aims to identify the pathogenic variants by performing genetic testing on a family with Branchio-oto-renal /Branchio-otic (BO, OMIM#602,588) syndrome using whole-exome sequencing, and to explore possible pathogenic mechanisms. METHODS: The family spans 4 generations and consists of 9 individuals, including 4 affected by the BOR/BO syndrome. Phenotypic information, including ear malformation and branchial cleft, was collected from family members. Audiological, temporal bone imaging, and renal ultrasound examinations were also performed. Whole-exome sequencing was conducted to identify candidate pathogenic variants and explore the underlying molecular etiology of BOR/BO syndrome by minigene experiments. RESULTS: Intra-familial variability was observed in the clinical phenotypes of BOR/BO syndrome in this family. The severity and nature of hearing loss varied in family members, with mixed or sensorineural hearing loss. The proband, in particular, had profound sensorineural hearing loss on the left and moderate conductive hearing loss on the right. Additionally, the proband exhibited developmental delay, and her mother experienced renal failure during pregnancy and terminated the pregnancy prematurely. Genetic testing revealed a novel heterozygous variant NM_000503.6: c.639 + 3 A > C in the EYA1 gene in affected family members. In vitro minigene experiments demonstrated its effect on splicing. According to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines, this variant was classified as likely pathogenic. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the phenotypic heterogeneity within the same family, reports the occurrence of renal failure and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a female patient at reproductive age with BOR syndrome, and enriches the mutational spectrum of pathogenic variants in the EYA1 gene.


Subject(s)
Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss , Renal Insufficiency , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome/genetics , Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome/pathology , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases/genetics , Hearing Loss/genetics , Pedigree , Nuclear Proteins/genetics
14.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med ; 16(1): e1-e8, 2024 Mar 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572860

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:  Unavailability of healthcare resources can lead to poor patient outcomes. The latter is true for infants with hearing loss and require early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI). AIM:  To determine the availability and distribution of resources for EHDI in state hospitals in the Eastern Cape (EC) province, South Africa. SETTING:  Sixteen state hospitals (nine district, four regional and three tertiary hospitals). METHODS:  Descriptive cross-sectional survey completed between July 2022 and October 2022. RESULTS:  Thirteen hospitals had audiologists (n = 4) or speech therapists and audiologists (n = 9). Specific to equipment, 10 hospitals had a screening otoacoustic emissions or automated auditory brainstem response, 8 hospitals had diagnostic middle ear analysers and only 3 hospitals had diagnostic auditory brainstem response and/or auditory steady state response. Twelve hospitals did not have visual response audiometry (VRA) and 94% had no hearing aid verification systems. Budget allocations were uneven, with only 10 hospitals, i.e., 4 districts, all regional and 2 tertiary hospitals being allocated varying amounts. Subsequently, only 50% provided newborn hearing screening, 56% provided diagnostic evaluations and 14 hospitals fitted hearing aids. CONCLUSION:  Results revealed a limited and uneven distribution of resources, which negatively impacted the provision of EHDI. Even distribution of healthcare resources and further research aimed at strengthening hearing health services is recommended as these could potentially improve equitable access to EHDI and the overall quality of healthcare provided.Contribution: This study highlights the need for even distribution of resources and strengthening of health systems, especially in the dawn of the National Health Insurance.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Hearing , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Child , Humans , South Africa , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing Tests , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/therapy , Neonatal Screening
15.
S Afr J Commun Disord ; 71(1): e1-e4, 2024 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572898

ABSTRACT

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programmes are recognised as the standard of care for newborns and infants presenting with hearing impairment, globally. However, widespread implementation of these programmes is far from being realised and faces numerous challenges within the South African context. The United Nations' sustainable development goal 3.8 and South Africa's national development plan seek to achieve equitable access to healthcare service, including EHDI. However, healthcare access is a complex concept which encompasses the dimensions: availability, affordability, acceptability and accommodation in healthcare. South Africa has made great progress towards universal implementation of EHDI programmes. Despite this progress, availability and affordability of these programmes are limited and their acceptability has received limited research focus in this context. Furthermore, accommodation of caregivers, as co-drivers of EHDI programmes and ensuring that EHDI programmes are linguistically and culturally congruent have also been overlooked within the South African context.Contribution: Increased robust efforts in improving access through availability and affordability of EHDI programmes are warranted in South Africa. However, improving access to these programmes through availability and affordability initiatives alone will not result in a pragmatic improvement in their accessibility. Acceptability of these programmes and accommodations such as involving caregivers and family members of children with hearing impairment as equal partners in EHDI programmes and being cognisant of their linguistic and cultural needs must be considered.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Hearing , Infant , Child , Infant, Newborn , Humans , South Africa , Hearing Tests , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Linguistics
16.
S Afr J Commun Disord ; 71(1): e1-e9, 2024 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:  Hearing impairment is an invisible disability affecting one in five people globally. Its ability to affect participation in activities of daily living means that it requires prompt identification and intervention. OBJECTIVE:  This article aims to define the process of accessing audiologists from the onset of symptoms for adults with hearing impairment in a peri-urban community in South Africa. METHOD:  Twenty-three participants were recruited through purposive sampling from an audiology department of a public hospital. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide, and data were mapped according to the participants' responses from the onset of ear and hearing symptoms to the point of audiologist consultation for analysis. RESULTS:  Seventeen (74%) participants had long journeys to accessing the audiologist after seeking help from multiple providers, with those with short journeys (26%) being referred mostly by public healthcare providers. Despite participants being from one peri-urban community, their journeys were influenced by socio-economics, health illiteracy and other structural factors. Finally, Ear-Nose-Throat specialists linked participants with audiology services. CONCLUSION:  Accessing audiology services is a complex process in some contexts. The disparities in the social environment, lifestyle factors and pluralistic healthcare models influence access to audiologists. Healthcare providers must take cognisance of the journeys of adults with hearing impairment in their clinical interventions. Universal health coverage, in the form of the planned National Health Insurance (NHI) for all South African citizens, will play an important role in addressing the societal inequalities in accessing healthcare. Factors leading to long journeys should be addressed to facilitate early intervention.Contribution: The study raises implications for the planned NHI in South Africa, suggesting that universal health coverage could play a vital role in addressing societal inequalities in accessing healthcare, including audiology services.


Subject(s)
Audiology , Hearing Loss , Adult , Humans , South Africa , Activities of Daily Living , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/therapy , Audiologists
17.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 155(4): 2482-2491, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38587430

ABSTRACT

Despite a vast literature on how speech intelligibility is affected by hearing loss and advanced age, remarkably little is known about the perception of talker-related information in these populations. Here, we assessed the ability of listeners to detect whether a change in talker occurred while listening to and identifying sentence-length sequences of words. Participants were recruited in four groups that differed in their age (younger/older) and hearing status (normal/impaired). The task was conducted in quiet or in a background of same-sex two-talker speech babble. We found that age and hearing loss had detrimental effects on talker change detection, in addition to their expected effects on word recognition. We also found subtle differences in the effects of age and hearing loss for trials in which the talker changed vs trials in which the talker did not change. These findings suggest that part of the difficulty encountered by older listeners, and by listeners with hearing loss, when communicating in group situations, may be due to a reduced ability to identify and discriminate between the participants in the conversation.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Loss , Humans , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Speech Intelligibility
19.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 155(4): 2589-2602, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38607268

ABSTRACT

The processing and perception of amplitude modulation (AM) in the auditory system reflect a frequency-selective process, often described as a modulation filterbank. Previous studies on perceptual AM masking reported similar results for older listeners with hearing impairment (HI listeners) and young listeners with normal hearing (NH listeners), suggesting no effects of age or hearing loss on AM frequency selectivity. However, recent evidence has shown that age, independently of hearing loss, adversely affects AM frequency selectivity. Hence, this study aimed to disentangle the effects of hearing loss and age. A simultaneous AM masking paradigm was employed, using a sinusoidal carrier at 2.8 kHz, narrowband noise modulation maskers, and target modulation frequencies of 4, 16, 64, and 128 Hz. The results obtained from young (n = 3, 24-30 years of age) and older (n = 10, 63-77 years of age) HI listeners were compared to previously obtained data from young and older NH listeners. Notably, the HI listeners generally exhibited lower (unmasked) AM detection thresholds and greater AM frequency selectivity than their NH counterparts in both age groups. Overall, the results suggest that age negatively affects AM frequency selectivity for both NH and HI listeners, whereas hearing loss improves AM detection and AM selectivity, likely due to the loss of peripheral compression.


Subject(s)
Data Compression , Deafness , Hearing Loss , Humans , Perceptual Masking
20.
Hum Genomics ; 18(1): 39, 2024 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38632618

ABSTRACT

Age-related cataract and hearing difficulties are major sensory disorders that often co-exist in the global-wide elderly and have a tangible influence on the quality of life. However, the epidemiologic association between cataract and hearing difficulties remains unexplored, while little is known about whether the two share their genetic etiology. We first investigated the clinical association between cataract and hearing difficulties using the UK Biobank covering 502,543 individuals. Both unmatched analysis (adjusted for confounders) and a matched analysis (one control matched for each patient with cataract according to confounding factors) were undertaken and confirmed that cataract was associated with hearing difficulties (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.98-2.27; OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.86-2.23, respectively). Furthermore, we explored and quantified the shared genetic architecture of these two complex sensory disorders at the common variant level using the bivariate causal mixture model (MiXeR) and conditional/conjunctional false discovery rate method based on the largest available genome-wide association studies of cataract (N = 585,243) and hearing difficulties (N = 323,978). Despite detecting only a negligible genetic correlation, we observe polygenic overlap between cataract and hearing difficulties and identify 6 shared loci with mixed directions of effects. Follow-up analysis of the shared loci implicates candidate genes QKI, STK17A, TYR, NSF, and TCF4 likely contribute to the pathophysiology of cataracts and hearing difficulties. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the presence of epidemiologic association between cataract and hearing difficulties and provides new insights into the shared genetic architecture of these two disorders at the common variant level.


Subject(s)
Cataract , Hearing Loss , Aged , Middle Aged , Humans , Genome-Wide Association Study/methods , Quality of Life , Hearing , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Genetic Loci , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases , Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...